KELUARGA NAJIB RAZAK KETURUNAN PENYAMUN DAN PENZALIM RAKYAT.

EVEN NAJIB’S MOTHER ‘PARTOOK’ OF HIS STOLEN 1MDB BILLIONS: SHOCK REPORT – ‘RM16BIL SWINDLED FROM 1MDB, AMOUNT STOLEN BY NAJIB ALONE RM4.2 BIL’

In March 2017, I had revealed details of RM15 billion looted from 1MDB by Najib, Rosmah and her son Riza Aziz, crony Jho Low and the Arab gang of Qubaisy, Husseiny, Prince Turki and Tarik Obaidi, assisted by other minor players. CLICK HERE. However, details of what exactly Najib and his family had blown their share of the loot on, were not too clear then. It is only in recent months that more specific details have emerged from documents leaked by a whistleblower from MACC, to Sarawak Report and PKR MP Rafizi Ramli. The total amount embezzled from 1MDB that we know of is about RM16 billion. See table below.

The amount stolen by Najib alone is about RM4.2 billion. This is based on information published earlier by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) that between 2011-2015, some US$1,050,795,451.58 @ average exchange rate 4 = RM4.2 billion, had flowed through Najib’s personal bank account with AMMB!! CLICK HERE.

Many have asked why it was necessary for Najib to have the infamous RM2.6 billion (US$681 million) transferred to his bank account, and then, approximately RM2 billion (US$620 million) transferred out again in 2013.

This was necessary to “cleanse” the money that was stolen from 1MDB. Earlier, Jho Low had trouble with Deutsche Bank’s due diligence department, in transferring money raised in the USA by Goldman Sachs, to non-Government of Malaysia bank accounts. He somehow managed to bluff his way out. He could not risk it a second time. So, Najib misused his position as Finance Minister, to transfer the RM2.6 billion to his bank account and out again, as once it had been established that the source of the money was from Malaysia’s Prime Minister and Finance Minister, no one abroad would question its legitimacy. Of course, Yeti at Bank Negara closed an eye to that massive crime by Najib and Jho Low. It was wholly an exercise in international money-laundering by Najib and Jho Low!

It is now very, very clear that Najib broke every law in Malaysia, and several others in many other countries too, to buy his way to victory at the 2013 general election. The main beneficiaries of the RM4.2 billion were of course UMNO and component parties of BN. More than that, there is every probability that Najib deployed stolen money to bribe judges and enrich himself and his family. Many UMNO/BN MP’s are hiding behind the fact that the money they received and pocketed did not come directly from Najib’s bank account, but (was illegally laundered) through Party and third-party bank accounts e.g. Nazir Razak, Najib’s younger brother.

How on earth could Najib bring himself to use stolen and horribly tainted money to “donate” RM7.5 million to his mother’s Toh Puan Rahah foundation? What was the money used for by the foundation? It only goes to show that Najib has lost all sense of right and wrong in the pursuit of power.

Riza Aziz’s bank account was also used by Jho Low to launder many of his expenses.

The good news is that more and more information is emerging with each passing day.

The bad news is we still do not know exactly how much of MoF’s debt of RM 46 billion, comprising RM42 billion of bond debt and other 1MDB borrowings and RM4 billion of KWAP loan parked under SRC, is lost forever. The truth is being expertly covered-up by Najib and his civil service henchmen.

More bad news is that Najib has to come up with another RM15 billion (US$3.5 billion) by Dccember 2017 to settle 1MDB’s additional debt owed to Abu Dhabi’s IPIC, arising from the arbitration case it lost in London in April.

But have no doubt, this is the heist of the century by Najib and no one from UMNO/BN dares ask him to step down as they have, together with our top cop and the judiciary, all been hopelessly compromised (bribed). More than that, as Asia Sentinel remarked, 3 murders – Altantuya, Hussain Najadi and Kevin Morais – revolve around Najib and Rosmah.

And have no doubt, they will ALL pay for it with long stints at Bamboo River Resort!

BACA DISINI UNTUK KISAH DATUK DAN BAPA NAJIB.

http://pemimpinpendusta62.blogspot.my/2017/05/bapak-borek-anak-rintek-keluarga-tun.html

'Independent Individual'? The Very Strange Case Of Special Prosecutor Shafee Abdullah

'Independent Individual'? The Very Strange Case Of Special Prosecutor Shafee Abdullah

• 3 June 2017
 
• 7 comments

Sarawak Report has invited lawyer Shafee Abdullah to explain the very large personal payments made to him by Prime Minister Najib Razak out of money stolen from 1MDB totalling RM9.5 million.

Task Force investigation documents show that the second payment of RM5.3 million was paid just a fortnight before the Appeal Court over-turned an earlier High Court acquittal of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim on charges of sodomy.  In an unorthodox move, the private barrister had been brought in to lead that prosecution by the Najib administration.

So far Shafee has not provided any explanation or responded to the press.  Sarawak Report understands that he cancelled engagements at the end of the week, citing he was unwell. He has not denied the figures, which are contained in documents where other payments have been confirmed (including payments to Najib’s brother).

Labour of Love?

It raises some extraordinary issues, because back in 2014 the public was told to believe that this high-powered barrister, a known favourite of the Najib administration, had conducted the entire Appeal prosecution against Anwar for a paltry sum of just RM1,000 (US$230 at present rates).

This was the sum that Nancy Shukri, a minister in the Prime Minister’s Office, provided to Parliament when questioned on this very matter, owing to the unusual nature of Shafee’s appointment to a job that would normally have been done by members of the Public Prosecution Service.

The opposition parties had suspected that Shafee must have been paid far above the normal rates at public expense to conduct the Appeal and then to further take the case through the Federal Court.  However, Shukri stunned them with the opposite information.

In an extraordinary statement she said that the government had made an exception to normal rules of privacy in this case, in order to disclose the miscroscopic fee.  In fact, the minster added, Shafee had wanted to do the job for nothing at all, hence the token payment. “We wanted to be transparent” she said:

“Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nancy Shukri said she had obtained the agreement of the Attorney-General’s Chambers and Muhammad Shafee himself to reveal the amount after the matter was raised repeatedly in the house.

The matter was kept confidential to respect the ethics of professionalism and confidentiality of communication between employer and client, she said when replying to a question from Er Teck Hwa (DAP-Bakri), reported Bernama.

Er had wanted to know how much Muhammad Shafee was paid as the lead prosecutor during the hearing of Anwar’s case in the Court of Appeal and Federal Court.

The Federal Court upheld a Court of Appeal decision convicting Anwar and sentencing him to five year’s jail after finding him guilty of having sodomised his former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, in 2008.

Nancy also said that Muhammad Shafee had not sought a fee for his service but an agreement was reached on the payment.

“He had not wanted any payment for his service but we wanted to be transparent and after providing him with the terms of reference, we agreed on a fee,” she said.

Nancy also dismissed Er’s assumption that Muhammad Shafee’s appointment as the lead prosecutor indicated the weakness of staff in the Attorney-General’s Chambers to handle the case.

She said the appointment of an independent individual was aimed at averting accusations by certain quarters. [Malaysian Times, March 2015]

However, central to the opposition case was that Shafee Abdullah was not an “independent individual”.  He was a known close confidante of the Prime Minister, who had a direct interest in jailing Anwar, a powerful political opponent who had got more votes at the previous election.

Shafee Abdullah was also a material witness to the case, according to the defence, because the lawyer had been in Najib’s house the very day and time that the alleged victim admitted he had been discussing his plans to denounce Anwar Ibrahim with the Prime Minister (a meeting Najib had at first attempted to deny).

Anwar’s case, therefore, was that there had been a clear conspiracy to frame and jail him and that Shafee Abdullah was at the centre of it.  However, the court refused to dismiss the unusual move to appoint this “independent individual” to conduct the prosecution in the place of the prosecution service.

Independent Individual?

What is anyone to make of it?  For a barrister to accept just a token fee to undertake such a major public prosecution must be without precedent.  Having done so, how could Shafee then argue that he had undertaken this frankly sordid case except for motives of personal conviction?  And if he was personally motivated as to the outcome, how could he be described as “an independent individual” suitable to conduct the case?

Shafee’s motivation is in fact clearly known to all.  He wanted Anwar jailed on behalf of his close political friend, possibly because he was also convinced that Malaysia would be better off without Anwar. However, such motives have no place in any court room.

To add to the evidence about his personal passion over the case Shafee went on after Anwar’s jailing to conduct ‘road shows’ around Malaysia, lecturing audiences as to why the conviction was correct and sound.  He was censured by colleagues for sharing alleged details of the case, which had been barred from open court during these road shows, presumably with the purpose of sullying Anwar’s reputation further with voters. He later lost his libel action against the members of the Bar behind that censure.

Despite the bizarre nature of these circumstances, where it would seem that Shafee had damned himself by agreeing to conduct such a case for nothing, the courts of Malaysia continued to accept his untoward role in the trial and indeed the judges eventually found in his favour, curtly overturning the finding of the original High Court judge, who had presided for years over the details of the case.

Payment after All?

So, now that it has emerged that Shafee in fact did receive an enormous cheque from Najib himself during this exact same period, it is only fair and acceptable to ask whether this was in fact his payment for carrying out the Anwar job?

In fact, opposition spokesmen have already lodged a police report about the matter and demanded full details of this payment.  Anwar’s lawyers are considering their next moves in the light of the emerging probability that his prosecution may have been paid for by an interested party who was directly connected to the case, namely Najib Razak.

So far there has been silence from Shafee and Najib.  However, if Shafee was simultaneously conducting major services for the Prime Minister at the time of prosecuting Anwar this is clearly the time they should be revealing this information.

It doesn’t make matters much better, of course. Because, if Najib was also a client of Shafee at the time of the trial, conflicts of interests surely abound?

Pascal Najadi - My Fury Over Najib's Lawyer Mohd Shafee Abdullah

Pascal Najadi - My Fury Over Najib's Lawyer Mohd Shafee Abdullah

• 1 June 2017
 

 

The son of the assassinated former chairman of AmBank, Hussein Najadi, has told Sarawak Report that he has deep concerns about the way the lawyer Mohd Shafee Abdullah controlled events after his father was shot in broad daylight in KL.

The shocking event took place just a few weeks before another huge personal payment by Prime Minister Najib was made to Shafee of RM4.3 million.

The payment was transacted on 11th September 2013, whereas Najadi was murdered on 29th July.  Once again, the money came  from Account no: 2112022011906 in Najib’s name, which was funded by money stolen from 1MDB’s subsidiary SRC.

Payment by Najib to Shafee from the 1MDB funded AmBank account

Pascal Najadi, who was in Moscow when the tragedy occured, says that neither he nor his immediate family knew Shafee and no one had contacted him to be involved. Nevertheless, the lawyer mysteriously arrived at the hospital almost as soon as his father’s body was brought into the mortuary and started to take charge of events.

Photographs even show Shafee on the scene as an ambulance bearing Najadi’s injured second wife arrived, bringing Najadi to the mortuary:

Arrow points out Shafee in the background as the victims arrived at hospital

According to Najadi, the family soon found that this strange lawyer was muscling in on their situation and insisting on taking control. Pascal has testified:

Tuesday July 30 2013, it must have been lunch time or a little later in KL, my mum Heidi Najadi called me from the KLK Morgue where they have laid up the body of my late father… She asked me “there is this Dato Shafee running around rude and nervous acting as if he owns the body of dad and giving orders to all of us?!” I asked my mum, who? She said “His name is Dato Shafee..?!” I told my mum to pass this man on the phone to me.

 This is my perception of this call. Dato Shafee was nervous when talking to me, he was breathing short and gave half clipped words answers to my question: “Can we wait with the burial please?” He stuttered to me: “No can not, all is in hand, I take care of all, he will be buried today, this evening…”

Pascal says he was shocked by the haste and by manner in which decisions were taken out of his family’s hands. He says a swift burial was not their custom and he had wanted to be able to fly to KL to attend the ceremony.

Shafee did not say “I am so sorry for your terrible loss….or can I help you are you OK? Where are you now? ” He said nothing of what a normal human or indeed a friend would say.

Shafee was the ad hoc burial master for the body of my late father Hussain without any reason, he even had the service paid every penny of it to make it fast and swift”,

says Najadi in his statement.

“I am taking charge”

Shafee, Scivetti and another joint foreign client on drugs charges

Speaking to Sarawak Report Pascal Najadi says that Shafee had told the family that he had been ‘put in charge’ of matters, but he never explained by whom.

Shafee, whom he described as brusque and nervous, managed the entire funeral and all the related matters, yet Najadi says the family never received a bill from him.

An email exchange with Shafee Abdullah (copied to Tania Scivetti his legal collaborator and later wife) confirms Najadi’s claim that the lawyer had put himself in charge of events, telling Pascal “I am taking care of the funeral”.

The lawyer even swept aside the son’s request to have words read out at the funeral, which was being held before he could get to his father’s side, saying “it is impossible to read the eulogy you prepared in a Muslim funeral setting” – then, imperiously he declared “I will make sure Hussain gets the best send off” despite refusing to wait a few hours for the arrival of his son:

Curt response from a bossy stranger – the only words Najadi received in writing from Shafee Abdullah

Pascal, who describes himself as having been in shock and frightened at the time, soon decided that the situation KL was not safe for his mother and himself and they fled the country, leaving much unfinished business in the process.

However, the role and the behaviour of Shafee has always bothered him, in particular the question over who had so swiftly assigned him to these duties and paid for his services?

Assigned by Najib?  If so, why?

Najadi says there is no evidence that Shafee had any prior connection to his deceased father.  Rather, he says, he later learnt that the lawyer was extremely close to Prime Minister Najib Razak, against whom his father had just made some extremely serious reports.

In the days prior to his mystery assassination Hussein Najadi had, according to his son, first made a formal complaint to the Bank Negara about information he had received about Najib’s huge private bank accounts at AmBank, where Najadi had once been Chairman.

Secondly, just days before his death, Najadi had made a police report about a threatening text to ‘back-off’ the matter, allegedly sent from within the Prime Minister’s Office.

In a written statement made in July 2015 Pascal Najadi told his lawyer:

“I went through the lifelong email archives of my late father to perhaps find a friendly or a business email between the two, I can confirm here, not one email nothing, no trace of contact. Shafee appeared like a flash out of nowhere buried my dad and disappeared into thin air, no call no nothing (!) He vanished fast and without a word like he appeared from nowhere on July 30th 2013. Never heard of the man again…. only after the killing I found out that this Shafee is the de facto lawyer for Najjib and UMNO and is the man who also was hired to put Anwar away. [Pascal Najadi, statement July 2015]

Pascal Najadi says he is now openly questioning whether Najib’s RM4.3 million payment from Najib so soon after these events may have been linked?  He says he has also noted that it was also shortly after his father’s tragic demise that Shafee was given the honour of the title Tan Sri:

“We are still puzzled why and how he surfaced on to the gruesome macabre scene taking charge of the burial. To this day today Shafee, who got promoted to Tan sri right after this horrible event, and his role are a mystery to me.”

Tania Scivetti

Pascal Najadi says that if his concerns are misplaced, then all Shafee needs to do is to give him full disclosure about his role and how all his costs were covered.  Meanwhile, there was another strange intervention, which he says has also bothered him, especially since he now realises it was also linked to Shafee Abdullah.

He had had struck a recent acquaintance, says Najadi, with another KL legal practioner Tania Scivetti. Scivetti’s practice is perhaps best known for supporting high-profile foreign drug offenders caught in Malaysia.  On a number of occasions, she has worked with Shafee to represent them and get them repatriated.

Shafee and Scivetti worked together to assist this and other foreigners who had got into trouble with Malaysian law

What Pascal Najadi was not aware of was that Sciavetti (a non-Muslim) was already the common law wife of Shafee Abdullah, whom she later married in the UK.  Shortly after his father’s death Tania called Pascal to offer her legal services and to help put his father’s affairs in order.

In particular, she offered to get the locks changed on Najadi’s offices and to hire a guard to prevent intruders taking documents.  The staff were removed.

Pascal said that he agreed to the suggestion, based on his acquaintance with Scivetti.  For some days Scivetti managed Najadi’s affairs and had total control of all access to his office and his papers.  Then, she ceased answering calls and terminated her services.  This was one email from Pascal, to which she did not reply:

Scivetti abruptly terminated services with the Najadis they say

Pascal Najadi, who claims his father’s murder has never been properly investigated in Malaysia, has told Sarawak Report that he has been left wondering if Scivetti and Shafee were in fact working together on his case, as in so many others?

If so, he wants to know who prompted them to get in touch and get busy over his father’s death and who paid?

“I want to know if Najib’s multi-million payment to Shafee Abdullah so soon after my father’s death was connected” he told Sarawak Report. “We know this money came from 1MDB so we have a right to know if it was and if so why?  If it was not connected then what was the payment for and who covered Shafee’s costs instead?
”