ANTI PEMIMPIN PENDUSTA DAN ZALIM.


AHMAD BAHAROM CREATION.


1AQIDAH: ALLAH DIDAHULUKAN, RASULULLAH DIUTAMAKAN..... "Terimalah sedikit kesusahan dunia yang sementara,dalam menegakkan kebenaran untuk terlepas daripada kesusahan Akhirat yang berkekalan"


Lawati page dan group ABC di Facebook.

1. Ahmad Baharom Commantary https://www.facebook.com/ahmad.baharom.9
2. Ahmad Baharom Collections https://www.facebook.com/AhmadBaharomCreation/
3. Anti Pemimpin Pendusta, Mungkar dan Zalim https://www.facebook.com/AhmadBaharomCreation2/
4. ABC Conflicts News https://www.facebook.com/AhmadBaharomCreation3/
5. Agama Bangsa Cemerlang https://www.facebook.com/groups/ahmadbaharom62/

Dan beberapa group yang boleh dikenali dengan ABC.

BLOG INI ADALAH BERKAITAN AGAMA DAN POLITIK.
Tulis Carian Anda didalam line putih dibawah


1AQIDAH: ALLAH DIDAHULUKAN, RASULULLAH DIUTAMAKAN..... "Terimalah sedikit kesusahan dun

Wednesday, 9 August 2017

MEMALI- KENYATAAN MUSA HITAM

Memali : Akhirnya penipuan Mahathir selama 30 tahun terbongkar jua...


Selepas hampir 30 tahun peristiwa Memali berlaku, bekas timbalan perdana menteri Tun Musa Hitam mendedahkan bahawa perdana menteri ketika itu Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad berada di Kuala Lumpur, bukannya China sebagaimana yang diberitakan sebelum ini.

Pendedahan ini dibuat sendiri oleh Musa yang juga menteri keselamatan dalam negeri ketika peristiwa itu berlaku pada 19 November 1985 yang mengorbankan 14 orang dan berpuluh yang lain cedera.

Musa mendedahkan perkara ini dalam Diskusi Politik Malaysia: Dulu dan Sekarang anjuran Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan yang diadakan di Kota Bharu malam kelmarin.

Turut serta bersama beliau sebagai panel adalah naib presiden PAS Datuk Husam Musa dan moderatornya adalah Profesor Madya Datuk Dr Mohmamad Agus Yusof.

Musa ketika menjawab soalan Agus berkata, Dr Mahathir berada di Kuala Lumpur ketika kejadian itu bahkan, "Dua tiga hari selepas kejadian itu pun dia berada di Kuala Lumpur."

Ia disambut oleh Agus dengan berkata "Oh my God," dengan nada terkejut ekoran pendedahan Musa itu kerana media melaporkan Dr Mahathir berada di China ketika kejadian itu berlaku.

"Ok, my God, our God," kata Musa menyambut kenyataan Agus sambil ketawa dengan pendedahan itu.

Dalam diskusi itu juga Musa berkata, "titik hitam dalam politik saya adalah Memali, saya cakap terus terang." Musa berkata, itulah juga yang dinyatakan beliau kepada kawan-kawanya dalam politik dan di mana-mana.

Menurut ensiklopedia bebas, Wikipedia, peristiwa Memali berlaku pada 19 November 1985. Insiden ini mengorbankan 14 orang dan berpuluh-puluh yang lain tercedera serta penahanan beratus-ratus orang.

Kesemua yang ditahan telah dibebaskan kecuali 36 orang.

Mereka ditahan di bawah Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (ISA).

Dalam pertempuran antara orang kampung dengan pihak polis, Ustaz Ibrahim Mahmud atau lebih dikenali dengan Ibrahim Libya terbunuh.

Polis memanggil operasi ini sebagai 'Operasi Angkara atau Operasi Hapus'.

"Ketika itu Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad selaku Perdana Menteri Malaysia berada di China," menurut Wikipedia, dan kini baru didedahkan sebaliknya oleh Musa apabila beliau berkata ketika itu Dr Mahathir berada di Kuala Lumpur.

Peristiwa Memali berlaku apabila polis cuba menahan Ibrahim Libya di bawah Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (ISA) kerana didakwa mengamalkan ajaran sesat.

Ibrahim pula tidak mahu menyerah diri kalau mahu ditahan di bawah ISA. Akibatnya polis merempuh perumahan Ibrahim Libya dan pengikutnya dengan kereta perisai dan mengakibatkan 14 terbunuh.

Musa dipersalahkan dengan peristiwa itu dan Dr Mahathir selaku perdana menteri terlepas kerana dia diberitakan berada di luar negara ketika itu, iaitu China.

Pendedahan Musa hari ini akan memberikan satu episod baru dalam peristiwa hitam ini.

PAS menyifatkan semua yang terbunuh sebagai mati syahid manakala Sultan Kedah Tuanku Abdul Halim menziarahi kubur Allahyarham dan pengikutnya serta menyiramkan air mawar di atas pusara mereka ~ The Malaysian Insider

Videonya silalah lihat di ( SINI )

Zahid Kantoi Lagi Berbohong: Bukti Arkib Negara Tun M Berada Di China Ketika Memali..SEBARKAN

Zahid Kantoi Lagi Berbohong: Bukti Arkib Negara Tun M Berada Di China Ketika Memali..SEBARKAN


Zahid Hamidi menimbulkan isu baru menuduh Tun Mahathir berada di dalam negara ketika peristiwa Memali. Namun terdapat bukti dalam arkib negara Tun Mahathir berada di China ketika peristiwa Memali. Tindakan Zahid cuba mengalih perhatian dari isu beliau berjumpa Tun Mahathir untuk menjatuhkan Najib kini memakan diri sekali lagi.

Dua tahun yang lalu Suara Kami telah menyiarkan artikel tentang Musa Hitam telah berbohong dalam peristiwa Memali dengan mengatakan Tun Mahathir berada dalam negara ketika peristiwa Memali.

Artikel beserta bukti Tun Mahathir berada di China


Kononnya kita digemparkan oleh satu berita dimana Musa Hitam menuduh Tun M berada di Malaysia sewaktu berlakunya kejadian Mamali 19 November 1985.

Kalau benar, kenapa selepas hampir 30 tahun, baru nak habaq? Mc tertarik dengan jawapan yang diberi oleh blog Pengundi Sg Rapat.

Musa Hitam dedahkan Tun Dr Mahathir berada di Malaysia, bukannya berada di China seperti yang dilaporkan dalam media dalam insiden MEMALI pada 19 nov 1985 yang mengorbankan 14 nyawa.

Musa dedahkannya di Forum Diskusi Politik Malaysia, anjuran Kerajaan Kelantan kelmarin dan moderatornya Prof Datuk Dr Mohamamad Agus Yusof.

Menurut Musa Hitam, Tun Dr Mahathir tidak berada di China, tetapi berada di Malaysia bukan setakat hari pertama kejadian sahaja, malah hingga hari ke empat.

Betul ke? Takpa kita baca dulu fitnah ni kat blog ni. Klik sini.

Dah habis baca? 

Malang sekali, ada bukti bahawa pada tarikh 22.11.1985 di Qing Hua University Beijing, Tun Dr Mahathir ada berucap disana, ini membuktikan Tun Dr Mahathir berada Di China.

Malah dalam buku " Five Principles of Chinese Policies" menunjukkan bahawa Tun Dr Mahathir sememangnya di China pada 20 - 28 November 1985!





Rujuk Link Arkid Ucapan PMO klik di SINI

Kegilaan apakah yang melanda Musa Hitam yang juga bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan juga Menteri Dalam Negeri ketika itu, sanggup menuduh Tun Dr Mahathir sedemikian rupa?

Ini adalah kertas putih yang ditandatangan sendiri oleh Musa Hitam dan dibentangkan di Parlimen tanpa sebarang bantahan dari PAS. Nak baca boleh klik sini 

Yang paling lucu, Prof Agus begitu terperanjat dengan kenyataan Musa Hitam hingga terkeluar perkataan "Oh My God".

Hakikatnya..

Bila berada dipentas bersama dengan ahli politik Pas, Musa Hitam akan bertukar menjadi Pas,..inilah standard orang Melayu berpolitik demi untuk mencari kuasa.

Monday, 5 June 2017

KELUARGA NAJIB RAZAK KETURUNAN PENYAMUN DAN PENZALIM RAKYAT.






EVEN NAJIB’S MOTHER ‘PARTOOK’ OF HIS STOLEN 1MDB BILLIONS: SHOCK REPORT – ‘RM16BIL SWINDLED FROM 1MDB, AMOUNT STOLEN BY NAJIB ALONE RM4.2 BIL’


In March 2017, I had revealed details of RM15 billion looted from 1MDB by Najib, Rosmah and her son Riza Aziz, crony Jho Low and the Arab gang of Qubaisy, Husseiny, Prince Turki and Tarik Obaidi, assisted by other minor players. CLICK HERE. However, details of what exactly Najib and his family had blown their share of the loot on, were not too clear then. It is only in recent months that more specific details have emerged from documents leaked by a whistleblower from MACC, to Sarawak Report and PKR MP Rafizi Ramli. The total amount embezzled from 1MDB that we know of is about RM16 billion. See table below.
The amount stolen by Najib alone is about RM4.2 billion. This is based on information published earlier by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) that between 2011-2015, some US$1,050,795,451.58 @ average exchange rate 4 = RM4.2 billion, had flowed through Najib’s personal bank account with AMMB!! CLICK HERE.
Many have asked why it was necessary for Najib to have the infamous RM2.6 billion (US$681 million) transferred to his bank account, and then, approximately RM2 billion (US$620 million) transferred out again in 2013.
This was necessary to “cleanse” the money that was stolen from 1MDB. Earlier, Jho Low had trouble with Deutsche Bank’s due diligence department, in transferring money raised in the USA by Goldman Sachs, to non-Government of Malaysia bank accounts. He somehow managed to bluff his way out. He could not risk it a second time. So, Najib misused his position as Finance Minister, to transfer the RM2.6 billion to his bank account and out again, as once it had been established that the source of the money was from Malaysia’s Prime Minister and Finance Minister, no one abroad would question its legitimacy. Of course, Yeti at Bank Negara closed an eye to that massive crime by Najib and Jho Low. It was wholly an exercise in international money-laundering by Najib and Jho Low!
It is now very, very clear that Najib broke every law in Malaysia, and several others in many other countries too, to buy his way to victory at the 2013 general election. The main beneficiaries of the RM4.2 billion were of course UMNO and component parties of BN. More than that, there is every probability that Najib deployed stolen money to bribe judges and enrich himself and his family. Many UMNO/BN MP’s are hiding behind the fact that the money they received and pocketed did not come directly from Najib’s bank account, but (was illegally laundered) through Party and third-party bank accounts e.g. Nazir Razak, Najib’s younger brother.
How on earth could Najib bring himself to use stolen and horribly tainted money to “donate” RM7.5 million to his mother’s Toh Puan Rahah foundation? What was the money used for by the foundation? It only goes to show that Najib has lost all sense of right and wrong in the pursuit of power.
Riza Aziz’s bank account was also used by Jho Low to launder many of his expenses.



The good news is that more and more information is emerging with each passing day.
The bad news is we still do not know exactly how much of MoF’s debt of RM 46 billion, comprising RM42 billion of bond debt and other 1MDB borrowings and RM4 billion of KWAP loan parked under SRC, is lost forever. The truth is being expertly covered-up by Najib and his civil service henchmen.
More bad news is that Najib has to come up with another RM15 billion (US$3.5 billion) by Dccember 2017 to settle 1MDB’s additional debt owed to Abu Dhabi’s IPIC, arising from the arbitration case it lost in London in April.
But have no doubt, this is the heist of the century by Najib and no one from UMNO/BN dares ask him to step down as they have, together with our top cop and the judiciary, all been hopelessly compromised (bribed). More than that, as Asia Sentinel remarked, 3 murders – Altantuya, Hussain Najadi and Kevin Morais – revolve around Najib and Rosmah.
And have no doubt, they will ALL pay for it with long stints at Bamboo River Resort!

BACA DISINI UNTUK KISAH DATUK DAN BAPA NAJIB.

http://pemimpinpendusta62.blogspot.my/2017/05/bapak-borek-anak-rintek-keluarga-tun.html

Saturday, 3 June 2017

'Independent Individual'? The Very Strange Case Of Special Prosecutor Shafee Abdullah


'Independent Individual'? The Very Strange Case Of Special Prosecutor Shafee Abdullah

Sarawak Report has invited lawyer Shafee Abdullah to explain the very large personal payments made to him by Prime Minister Najib Razak out of money stolen from 1MDB totalling RM9.5 million.

Task Force investigation documents show that the second payment of RM5.3 million was paid just a fortnight before the Appeal Court over-turned an earlier High Court acquittal of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim on charges of sodomy.  In an unorthodox move, the private barrister had been brought in to lead that prosecution by the Najib administration.
So far Shafee has not provided any explanation or responded to the press.  Sarawak Report understands that he cancelled engagements at the end of the week, citing he was unwell. He has not denied the figures, which are contained in documents where other payments have been confirmed (including payments to Najib’s brother).

Labour of Love?

It raises some extraordinary issues, because back in 2014 the public was told to believe that this high-powered barrister, a known favourite of the Najib administration, had conducted the entire Appeal prosecution against Anwar for a paltry sum of just RM1,000 (US$230 at present rates).
This was the sum that Nancy Shukri, a minister in the Prime Minister’s Office, provided to Parliament when questioned on this very matter, owing to the unusual nature of Shafee’s appointment to a job that would normally have been done by members of the Public Prosecution Service.
The opposition parties had suspected that Shafee must have been paid far above the normal rates at public expense to conduct the Appeal and then to further take the case through the Federal Court.  However, Shukri stunned them with the opposite information.
In an extraordinary statement she said that the government had made an exception to normal rules of privacy in this case, in order to disclose the miscroscopic fee.  In fact, the minster added, Shafee had wanted to do the job for nothing at all, hence the token payment. “We wanted to be transparent” she said:

“Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nancy Shukri said she had obtained the agreement of the Attorney-General’s Chambers and Muhammad Shafee himself to reveal the amount after the matter was raised repeatedly in the house.
The matter was kept confidential to respect the ethics of professionalism and confidentiality of communication between employer and client, she said when replying to a question from Er Teck Hwa (DAP-Bakri), reported Bernama.
Er had wanted to know how much Muhammad Shafee was paid as the lead prosecutor during the hearing of Anwar’s case in the Court of Appeal and Federal Court.
The Federal Court upheld a Court of Appeal decision convicting Anwar and sentencing him to five year’s jail after finding him guilty of having sodomised his former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, in 2008.
Nancy also said that Muhammad Shafee had not sought a fee for his service but an agreement was reached on the payment.
“He had not wanted any payment for his service but we wanted to be transparent and after providing him with the terms of reference, we agreed on a fee,” she said.
Nancy also dismissed Er’s assumption that Muhammad Shafee’s appointment as the lead prosecutor indicated the weakness of staff in the Attorney-General’s Chambers to handle the case.
She said the appointment of an independent individual was aimed at averting accusations by certain quarters. [Malaysian Times, March 2015]
However, central to the opposition case was that Shafee Abdullah was not an “independent individual”.  He was a known close confidante of the Prime Minister, who had a direct interest in jailing Anwar, a powerful political opponent who had got more votes at the previous election.
Shafee Abdullah was also a material witness to the case, according to the defence, because the lawyer had been in Najib’s house the very day and time that the alleged victim admitted he had been discussing his plans to denounce Anwar Ibrahim with the Prime Minister (a meeting Najib had at first attempted to deny).
Anwar’s case, therefore, was that there had been a clear conspiracy to frame and jail him and that Shafee Abdullah was at the centre of it.  However, the court refused to dismiss the unusual move to appoint this “independent individual” to conduct the prosecution in the place of the prosecution service.

Independent Individual?

What is anyone to make of it?  For a barrister to accept just a token fee to undertake such a major public prosecution must be without precedent.  Having done so, how could Shafee then argue that he had undertaken this frankly sordid case except for motives of personal conviction?  And if he was personally motivated as to the outcome, how could he be described as “an independent individual” suitable to conduct the case?
Shafee’s motivation is in fact clearly known to all.  He wanted Anwar jailed on behalf of his close political friend, possibly because he was also convinced that Malaysia would be better off without Anwar. However, such motives have no place in any court room.
To add to the evidence about his personal passion over the case Shafee went on after Anwar’s jailing to conduct ‘road shows’ around Malaysia, lecturing audiences as to why the conviction was correct and sound.  He was censured by colleagues for sharing alleged details of the case, which had been barred from open court during these road shows, presumably with the purpose of sullying Anwar’s reputation further with voters. He later lost his libel action against the members of the Bar behind that censure.
Despite the bizarre nature of these circumstances, where it would seem that Shafee had damned himself by agreeing to conduct such a case for nothing, the courts of Malaysia continued to accept his untoward role in the trial and indeed the judges eventually found in his favour, curtly overturning the finding of the original High Court judge, who had presided for years over the details of the case.

Payment after All?

So, now that it has emerged that Shafee in fact did receive an enormous cheque from Najib himself during this exact same period, it is only fair and acceptable to ask whether this was in fact his payment for carrying out the Anwar job?
In fact, opposition spokesmen have already lodged a police report about the matter and demanded full details of this payment.  Anwar’s lawyers are considering their next moves in the light of the emerging probability that his prosecution may have been paid for by an interested party who was directly connected to the case, namely Najib Razak.
So far there has been silence from Shafee and Najib.  However, if Shafee was simultaneously conducting major services for the Prime Minister at the time of prosecuting Anwar this is clearly the time they should be revealing this information.
It doesn’t make matters much better, of course. Because, if Najib was also a client of Shafee at the time of the trial, conflicts of interests surely abound?

Friday, 2 June 2017

Pascal Najadi - My Fury Over Najib's Lawyer Mohd Shafee Abdullah

Pascal Najadi - My Fury Over Najib's Lawyer Mohd Shafee Abdullah


The son of the assassinated former chairman of AmBank, Hussein Najadi, has told Sarawak Report that he has deep concerns about the way the lawyer Mohd Shafee Abdullah controlled events after his father was shot in broad daylight in KL.

The shocking event took place just a few weeks before another huge personal payment by Prime Minister Najib was made to Shafee of RM4.3 million.
The payment was transacted on 11th September 2013, whereas Najadi was murdered on 29th July.  Once again, the money came  from Account no: 2112022011906 in Najib’s name, which was funded by money stolen from 1MDB’s subsidiary SRC.
Payment by Najib to Shafee from the 1MDB funded AmBank account
Pascal Najadi, who was in Moscow when the tragedy occured, says that neither he nor his immediate family knew Shafee and no one had contacted him to be involved. Nevertheless, the lawyer mysteriously arrived at the hospital almost as soon as his father’s body was brought into the mortuary and started to take charge of events.
Photographs even show Shafee on the scene as an ambulance bearing Najadi’s injured second wife arrived, bringing Najadi to the mortuary:


Arrow points out Shafee in the background as the victims arrived at hospital
According to Najadi, the family soon found that this strange lawyer was muscling in on their situation and insisting on taking control. Pascal has testified:
Tuesday July 30 2013, it must have been lunch time or a little later in KL, my mum Heidi Najadi called me from the KLK Morgue where they have laid up the body of my late father… She asked me “there is this Dato Shafee running around rude and nervous acting as if he owns the body of dad and giving orders to all of us?!” I asked my mum, who? She said “His name is Dato Shafee..?!” I told my mum to pass this man on the phone to me.

 This is my perception of this call. Dato Shafee was nervous when talking to me, he was breathing short and gave half clipped words answers to my question: “Can we wait with the burial please?” He stuttered to me: “No can not, all is in hand, I take care of all, he will be buried today, this evening…”
Pascal says he was shocked by the haste and by manner in which decisions were taken out of his family’s hands. He says a swift burial was not their custom and he had wanted to be able to fly to KL to attend the ceremony.

Shafee did not say “I am so sorry for your terrible loss….or can I help you are you OK? Where are you now? ” He said nothing of what a normal human or indeed a friend would say.
Shafee was the ad hoc burial master for the body of my late father Hussain without any reason, he even had the service paid every penny of it to make it fast and swift”,
says Najadi in his statement.

“I am taking charge”


Shafee, Scivetti and another joint foreign client on drugs charges
Speaking to Sarawak Report Pascal Najadi says that Shafee had told the family that he had been ‘put in charge’ of matters, but he never explained by whom.
Shafee, whom he described as brusque and nervous, managed the entire funeral and all the related matters, yet Najadi says the family never received a bill from him.
An email exchange with Shafee Abdullah (copied to Tania Scivetti his legal collaborator and later wife) confirms Najadi’s claim that the lawyer had put himself in charge of events, telling Pascal “I am taking care of the funeral”.
The lawyer even swept aside the son’s request to have words read out at the funeral, which was being held before he could get to his father’s side, saying “it is impossible to read the eulogy you prepared in a Muslim funeral setting” – then, imperiously he declared “I will make sure Hussain gets the best send off” despite refusing to wait a few hours for the arrival of his son:


Curt response from a bossy stranger – the only words Najadi received in writing from Shafee Abdullah
Pascal, who describes himself as having been in shock and frightened at the time, soon decided that the situation KL was not safe for his mother and himself and they fled the country, leaving much unfinished business in the process.
However, the role and the behaviour of Shafee has always bothered him, in particular the question over who had so swiftly assigned him to these duties and paid for his services?

Assigned by Najib?  If so, why?

Najadi says there is no evidence that Shafee had any prior connection to his deceased father.  Rather, he says, he later learnt that the lawyer was extremely close to Prime Minister Najib Razak, against whom his father had just made some extremely serious reports.
In the days prior to his mystery assassination Hussein Najadi had, according to his son, first made a formal complaint to the Bank Negara about information he had received about Najib’s huge private bank accounts at AmBank, where Najadi had once been Chairman.
Secondly, just days before his death, Najadi had made a police report about a threatening text to ‘back-off’ the matter, allegedly sent from within the Prime Minister’s Office.
In a written statement made in July 2015 Pascal Najadi told his lawyer:

“I went through the lifelong email archives of my late father to perhaps find a friendly or a business email between the two, I can confirm here, not one email nothing, no trace of contact. Shafee appeared like a flash out of nowhere buried my dad and disappeared into thin air, no call no nothing (!) He vanished fast and without a word like he appeared from nowhere on July 30th 2013. Never heard of the man again…. only after the killing I found out that this Shafee is the de facto lawyer for Najjib and UMNO and is the man who also was hired to put Anwar away. [Pascal Najadi, statement July 2015]
Pascal Najadi says he is now openly questioning whether Najib’s RM4.3 million payment from Najib so soon after these events may have been linked?  He says he has also noted that it was also shortly after his father’s tragic demise that Shafee was given the honour of the title Tan Sri:
“We are still puzzled why and how he surfaced on to the gruesome macabre scene taking charge of the burial. To this day today Shafee, who got promoted to Tan sri right after this horrible event, and his role are a mystery to me.”


Tania Scivetti

Pascal Najadi says that if his concerns are misplaced, then all Shafee needs to do is to give him full disclosure about his role and how all his costs were covered.  Meanwhile, there was another strange intervention, which he says has also bothered him, especially since he now realises it was also linked to Shafee Abdullah.
He had had struck a recent acquaintance, says Najadi, with another KL legal practioner Tania Scivetti. Scivetti’s practice is perhaps best known for supporting high-profile foreign drug offenders caught in Malaysia.  On a number of occasions, she has worked with Shafee to represent them and get them repatriated.


Shafee and Scivetti worked together to assist this and other foreigners who had got into trouble with Malaysian law
What Pascal Najadi was not aware of was that Sciavetti (a non-Muslim) was already the common law wife of Shafee Abdullah, whom she later married in the UK.  Shortly after his father’s death Tania called Pascal to offer her legal services and to help put his father’s affairs in order.
In particular, she offered to get the locks changed on Najadi’s offices and to hire a guard to prevent intruders taking documents.  The staff were removed.
Pascal said that he agreed to the suggestion, based on his acquaintance with Scivetti.  For some days Scivetti managed Najadi’s affairs and had total control of all access to his office and his papers.  Then, she ceased answering calls and terminated her services.  This was one email from Pascal, to which she did not reply:


Scivetti abruptly terminated services with the Najadis they say
Pascal Najadi, who claims his father’s murder has never been properly investigated in Malaysia, has told Sarawak Report that he has been left wondering if Scivetti and Shafee were in fact working together on his case, as in so many others?
If so, he wants to know who prompted them to get in touch and get busy over his father’s death and who paid?
“I want to know if Najib’s multi-million payment to Shafee Abdullah so soon after my father’s death was connected” he told Sarawak Report. “We know this money came from 1MDB so we have a right to know if it was and if so why?  If it was not connected then what was the payment for and who covered Shafee’s costs instead?
”

Monday, 29 May 2017

SARAWAK REPORT HERET SULTAN PAHANG SEBAGAI PENERIMA DEDAK NAJIB.

SEKARANG SERAWAK REPORT HERET SULTAN PAHANG SEBAGAI PENERIMA DEDAK NAJIB.

Jika ini berita Fitnah, wajib disaman, jika tak saman dan diambil tindakan,maka maruah Raja-raja akan amat tercalar dengan amat parah.

Najib tiada lagi alasan untuk menyaman SARAWAK REPORT dan Majlis Raja-raja harus bertegas dalam hal ini.Rakyat Pahang khususnya serta kita semua rakyat malaysia tidak kira apa jua parti harus juga mendesak Najib mempertahankan Raja-Raja melayu kita.

SULTAN PAHANG KENA BANGUN DAN BERSIHKAN NAMA BAIK RAJA-RAJA MELAYU.

Najib Pahang sultan paid RM2 million from an account first major MDB exclusive!
28, 2017 May 0 comments
Records obtained by the Sarawak of the task force investigation to 1 mdb revealed that on 25 th October 2012 Prime Minister Najib Razak paid the Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, son of the late Sultan Abu Bakar RM2 million from the name itself, no bank account 2112022009694, which in turn is funded by hundreds of millions stolen from one mdb development fund.

This is the Pahang sultan, who is the ruler of the house of 86-year-old Najib and former general of the Malaysian state.

Marked 'confidential' investigation into the payment savings Najib is illegal ....

It brings out the multi-billion ringgit scandal to a new level, where hundreds of payments has been identified as the truth "rule of political parties" and vote for finance the purchase of the elections.

Now it has emerged despite the constitutional ruler of Malaysia have received what the prime minister of the distribution of the money stolen from malaysia is false development funds 1 mdb.

Payment next on the list, a check which has been dealing on 30th October, another RM2 million was made to the foundation eductaion mohammad Rahah Foundation, in the name of Najib's mother. A few more millions were made in a series of further payments to the same foundation.

Najib and his wife Rosmah is being very close to the Sultan Ahmad Shah, who has given consistent political support over the years. What is important from a personal payment of federal prime minister to the ruler of the state constitution voters) very much question the validity and civilized.

Royal birthday cake - Najib and Rosmah are above the sovereign ratings are extravagant celebrations

These concerns are made more accute by the fact that it is now known that the money stolen from public funds and have to borrow at very high rates of interest.

There is no reason to suggest that the sultan will recognize the stolen money. Even Najib still maintain, in the face of evidence produced by investigators globally, and our bank of the investigation department of justice, that the money was "donated" from the mysterious and unnamed Saudi government.

However, since Najib has no legitimate claim to a large private property, it begged the question as to where the sultan thought the money came from, why he received it and what is it?

Reverered in Pahang, but the sultan spent a lot of time abroad

"sultan london"
Sources said the family has confirmed that the sultan of Pahang is known for his love of the high life ':

"he called" the sultan of London' among the people who knew him. He was he spent a lot of time there and known to be high rollers in the casino. he enjoyed a lavish lifestyle of luxury, west. he lives in luxury and is engaged in a private jet, a continuous spenders ",

former close friend of the family told sarawak report. So, maybe the sultan can confirm that the money received from Najib has more meritorious goals, which will probably will allay some criticism?

However, concerns remain that Najib may have used stolen savings of public money to 'buy' support in the event of important ruler, a 1 mdb inaction has allowed him to weather a political storm so far caused by the swathe of verse crime.

Sultan of Pahang who were particularly at the instructions openly supported Najib. This from singapore straits times in April 2015 at the height of the scandal:

Pahang sultan primitive people to support Najib

Sultan of Pahang who has thrown his weight he was behind the prime minister of Malaysia Najib Razak, the image that has undergone a battering lately, warned his people not to "criticize without knowing the real issues".

Pahang Sultan Ahmad Shah told the people to support the leader of stretch, so as to maintain peace and prosperity in the country.

"Najib is a leader. I am a hard worker and very proud of him. Let us all pray that it remains in a position of leadership," the news agency reported sultan named Ahmad as saying in Indera Mahkota, Kuantan.

"People (person) must support him, do not criticize without knowing the real issue," he added. It is not clear what the "real issue" Sultan Ahmad is referring to. Datuk Seri Najib is the long-serving MP of Pekan, Pahang.

Sultan is leaning is the first to demonstrate the support of members of the royalty for Mr. Najib, who has felt the heat over several scandals, including allegations of fraud in state-owned investment arm, 1 Malaysia Development Bhd (1 .mdb).

Sarawak Report believes that the sultan of Pahang would explain the fact of payment.

Pahang is the leading family hereditory appear to include not only the sovereign, but also razak family.


HIMPUNAN PEMBENTANGAN "TAKFIR" PEMIMPIN PENDUSTA DAN ZALIM.


HIMPUNAN PEMBENTANGAN "TAKFIR' PEMIMPIN PENDUSTA DAN ZALIM SERTA PENYOKONGNYA.

KLIK PADA LINK DALAM PETAK MERAH UNTUK MEMBACA.
TAKFIR NO 1.
TAKFIR NO 2.
TAKFIR NO 3.
TAKFIR NO 4.
TAKFIR NO 5.
TAKFIR NO 6.
TAKFIR NO 7.
TAKFIR NO 8.
TAKFIR NO 9.
TAKFIR NO 10.
TAKFIR NO 11.
TAKFIR NO 12.
TAKFIR NO 13.
TAKFIR NO 14.

kakaktua800.blogspot.com

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...